Midweek Geekiness: Killing Mr. Thornton, or Anticipating The Great Red Dragon On Hannibal

image credit: Hannibal Twitter Page

I admit to having my qualms about Bryan Fuller’s Hannibal. Thomas Harris’ books still remained in my memory, along with their adaptations. How much more can a show do?

I watched Manhunter, the first movie to feature Hannibal Lecter, at 16 or 17. I only knew it as the one directed by the guy behind Miami Vice, plus two thumbs up on an episode of At The Movies on PBS. The idea of a FBI agent thinking like a serial killer fascinated me. Later I saw The Silence of the Lambs, and started to devour the books. I read ‘Silence’ on a road trip to Fargo, even anxious to return to the book after day-long shopping bouts. I read Red Dragon afterwards, Francis Dolarhyde taking his place along with Jamb Gum as the antagonist. I had trouble with Gum, but Francis deepened the question about what makes a killer. What makes an ordinary man commit evil acts? Mason Verger had his introduction through the audiobook for Hannibal, keeping me company on my drive to work. He’s just thoroughly despicable, with Harris himself reading his parents in that gulp-y voice. It’s the first time, after getting information about the character, I ever thought hmm..Hannibal may have done something right. The rest of the novel, especially its twist on Clarice, left me cold.

In the fall, after people recommended the show on Netflix, pneumonia finally given me the time to watch its first two seasons on Netflix. After watching Pushing Daisies, Heroes, Wonderfalls,and Dead Like Me‘s first season, the name ‘Bryan Fuller’ usually means I will go for a heck of a ride.

He did not disappoint.

I feasted on the dark comedy, the elaborate tableaus,  the equally elaborate meals prepared by Dr. Lecter, and  the relationship between Will Graham (Hugh Dancy) and Hannibal Lecter (Mads Mikkelsen). In fact I would call this show fanfic of the highest order. Everything in the first two-and-a-half seasons built itself towards a retelling of the Red Dragon story line. In the back of my mind I wished the actor good luck in trying to make it his own.

Then the news Richard Armitage signed on for the role made me squeak with excitement. Most of all it will finally bury the cravat for the time being. I like period dramas like the next woman, but from time to time performers need to shed the clothing, and his case he will do that literally, and go completely nuts. Guy of Gisbourne on Robin Hood gave people a taste of a sympathetic bastard. Francis Dolarhyde goes beyond ‘sympathetic bastard’ to a character inspiring understanding while inspiring numerous gasps. I will say ‘yikes’ a lot during the course of the run.

Lurking around the net, I did notice a few people yearning for a return to period pieces. I understand the plea, and its appeal, especially as Sam Heughan and Aidan Turn storm the air waves. I look for growth. I guess as someone on a quest for growth, I hope to look at people trying to do so in their own fields. From what I saw of the trailer for the upcoming arc, the Great Red Dragon may show the Master of Marlborough Mills who really can set a scene on fire.

I am looking forward to it.

4 thoughts on “Midweek Geekiness: Killing Mr. Thornton, or Anticipating The Great Red Dragon On Hannibal

  1. I say this only after years of experience with this fans — it’s been close to a decade of Richard Armitage without a cravat (if you count Monet), and nonetheless, the cravat is not buried, not for a lot of people. (I happen not to be one of those people, but I know a lot of them.) Many of them will not watch this, and the cravat will remain intact. Horror seems to be a line that a lot of people can’t make themselves cross, not even for Richard Armitage.


    1. I understand. Actually, people might disagree this is horror in the classic sense. I can cross it since I watched some it since my teens. In the case of Pride, Prejudice, and Zombies, the genres will cross in a unique way.


      1. I know some people think it’s not horror (including, apparently Richard Armitage), but I think that’s kind of beside the point for people who are troubled by the ideas behind the show and the repeating motifs, and the thing is that the label in that sense is probably less important than the rationale for why those people believe they don’t like horror. I mean, you can say something this gory is not horror, but it’s still full of gore. So calling it “not classic horror” doesn’t really repackage it enough for those people to watch it. I’m going to watch it, or at least start, and I agree that it isn’t like everything I associate with horror, but it has enough of the repellent things of that genre to give it that classification for me, who dislikes those things (chiefly, gore, cannibalism, creepiness, violence, heavy levels of suspense) even if by some definitions it could be classified as beautiful. For me, the jury is still out on that. I understand what people mean who say the show is beautiful, I just don’t know if I really agree.


What Do You Think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.